Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Success Rate with WGs  (Read 2535 times)

Offline knightofthegarter

I did a search to see if there had been any recent topic but couldn't see anything that wasn't more than a couple of years old. It would be interesting to hear what people's success rates are with booking wgs they have not seen before, so please don't count repeat visits but do count the original booking. What are your success rates ? Just to be clear, I mean success in terms of a good experience provided, not whether or not you successfully managed to arrange a booking. My own overall rate stands at 66%. I have become more stringent in the planning stages and this rate has gone up for more recent punts. I am however very cautious in my selection process and punt less than I used to. It would be good to hear other statistics and experiences.

Offline sublimetoridiculous

Too many variables for any stats to be meaningful.

What is clear to me though, is that success rate will be better with careful research, including on here, and *never* think with your dick!

Quesadilla

  • Guest
Only had 3 experiences I wasn't at least positive about if not absolutely   :rose::kissgirl::yahoo: :thumbsup:

So I'm running at a 19/22 success rate or 86.5% give or take.   :D


Offline CBPaul

Difficult to say really.

I tend to disregard the obviously fake profiles but send a quick email to those I'm unsure about, lack of a coherent response means I forget them. On that basis I'd guess overall success rate is about 50%.

Success rate must be closer to 80% for the profiles I'm pretty sure of though.

fredpunter

  • Guest
Of the last 5 I've seen for the first time, 2 excellent, 1 good, 1 ok and 1 poor. The 2 excellent were recommendations from here and I'm currently en route to see one of them again. The other three were all seen on a long weekend in manchester a couple of weeks ago when I wanted to explore the Manchester parlours.

Ravanelli

  • Guest
Based on my reviews here I'm running at 50% which seems pretty shit but I only really review new girls. If I reviewed the regular girls I see then then that figure would improve dramatically. Interestingly though, I'm someone who prefers the older milf type but they've been a disappointment of late. Thankfully I have two amazing regular Milfs.

Offline knightofthegarter

Since I have made my selection techniques more stringent, I've actually been running on a 100 %, though that recent figure only contains three different wgs, so clearly I cannot hope to maintain such a strike rate. My 66% total figure is however a longer and more representative timespan. Much of it was before I was using aw (not sure when that website got going, I didn't use them before about 2009), so really a case of pot luck sometimes ! Some of the input on this thread suggests that a figure in the eighties is achievable, with proper due diligence. Ravanelli, at 50% perhaps you are using a more speculative strategy, hopefully you have uncovered some crackers that you might otherwise have missed.

Offline threechilliman

30 +ve
3 -ve

So whatever percent that is - I guess 90.9% without calculating it.

If we work on this month only it's a different story

1 +ve
2 -ve

Which is 33.3%, or piss poor.

I've had a shockin' November with two punts to go - one of which will almost certainly be a cracker, the other is a bit of a shot in the dark

tcm

Offline madeinwales56

30 +ve
3 -ve

So whatever percent that is - I guess 90.9% without calculating it.

If we work on this month only it's a different story

1 +ve
2 -ve

Which is 33.3%, or piss poor.

I've had a shockin' November with two punts to go - one of which will almost certainly be a cracker, the other is a bit of a shot in the dark

tcm


WTF is all that supposed to mean? Are you a maths teacher or some such?
I've been punting far too long to have even kept count of success rate. Mind you, if you rate it on how many times I've shot my load with a prossie it's 100%.

Offline MancSean

Only had 3 experiences I wasn't at least positive about if not absolutely   :rose::kissgirl::yahoo: :thumbsup:

So I'm running at a 19/22 success rate or 86.5% give or take.   :D
Who's that bird in your avi btw

Offline threechilliman


WTF is all that supposed to mean? Are you a maths teacher or some such?
I've been punting far too long to have even kept count of success rate. Mind you, if you rate it on how many times I've shot my load with a prossie it's 100%.

My secrets out!! I can't believe you don't understand - basic gcse maths. I had a bit of fun with the kids in class this afternoon, getting them to work out my success with WG's each month, average punts per month and an overall score. How we laughed. Mind you, the headmistress didn't see the funny side of it... :lol: :lol:

tcm

Offline madeinwales56

... and getting your result to one decimal place "without calculating it" is most impressive. Miss would be pleased ...

Offline threechilliman

... and getting your result to one decimal place "without calculating it" is most impressive. Miss would be pleased ...

Your not the only one that finds it irritating

tcm

Online superchamp

66% for me. The way I did it is to use the review system scoring i.e. Positive, Neutral or Negative and then apply the old fashioned Football League points scoring system i.e. Pos = 2 points, Neutral = 1 and neg = zero. I've done 21 first time punts this year, so that's a potential 42 points of which I've scored 28 points which equals 66%.

Offline CBPaul

My secrets out!! I can't believe you don't understand - basic gcse maths. I had a bit of fun with the kids in class this afternoon, getting them to work out my success with WG's each month, average punts per month and an overall score. How we laughed. Mind you, the headmistress didn't see the funny side of it... :lol: :lol:

tcm

Excellent, applied maths, very proud of you tcm.

Much better than the abstract shit kids are taught is to relate the subject to the real world. Are they planning punting budgets and probability of contracting a dose of clap next ?

Offline threechilliman

Excellent, applied maths, very proud of you tcm.

Much better than the abstract shit kids are taught is to relate the subject to the real world. Are they planning punting budgets and probability of contracting a dose of clap next ?

Budgets and probability are down for next week. I'm also looking at anal-ysing a WG's services to try and find out the probability of what she does offer to what she says she offers. Might let the 'A-level' students play around with that one....

tcm

Offline CBPaul

Budgets and probability are down for next week. I'm also looking at anal-ysing a WG's services to try and find out the probability of what she does offer to what she says she offers. Might let the 'A-level' students play around with that one....

tcm

 :lol:

I think you'll find the probability of a prossie offering what the profile says is 1/10, giving a bullshit to fact ratio of 10:1


Quesadilla

  • Guest
Who's that bird in your avi btw
One of my fave pornstars - Russian I believe - called either Klara or Amanda in different clips I've seen. So cute, so filthy.  :kissgirl:
External Link/Members Only

Offline Thepacifist

When i first started out in Amsterdam at 18 i met some tricksters but i also met some gems. I always reported the shitters on the ignatzmice forum. 8 years on, after a lot of experience i'm a lot more picky now. There are no guarentees but i do a lot of research and read reviews on here. I think the service in the UK, london especially is far superior to the kamer girls of the rld. I've been lucky and am thankful for the great punts i've had. Remembering the bad punts helps me to try and insure that i stay vigilant in having good ones.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Only had 3 experiences I wasn't at least positive about if not absolutely   :rose::kissgirl::yahoo: :thumbsup:

So I'm running at a 19/22 success rate or 86.5% give or take.   :D

Maybe you are very easy to please, that is a very high success rate.      :unknown: :unknown: :unknown:

Quesadilla

  • Guest
Maybe you are very easy to please, that is a very high success rate.      :unknown: :unknown: :unknown:
I assume you've read some of my reviews so you have an idea what I like, which is a MGIADSE in most cases - and hopefully it's pretty clear from said reviews that I have got exactly that.

I would not say I am "easy" to please - I'm just very clear about what I want, I read the reviews here before even considering booking someone and then I email and explain exactly what I'm looking for first.  Based on the reply I get I either go ahead with the booking or stick them back on the HL. 

During a punt, I need to feel like the WG is genuinely "into it" - if I feel like she's faking it it's a total turn off for me, but I could just be incredibly naive and easy to fool.  In which case - lucky me!  :yahoo: Would hate to have punt after punt, pay out my hard earned cash and not absolutely enjoy it! That would be my definition of hell!  :diablo:

Offline threechilliman

Just realised I got my numbers wrong. It's actually 4 -ve out of 34 punts. So 87.9% success.

High, but most of my first 25 or so were with well reviewed WG's so were low risk. Having done most of those now, I'm into real 'punts' now so I guess my success rate (with new girls) will go down. I'm beginning to see the value in having a few regulars now...

tcm

Offline StevenS

Only had 3 experiences I wasn't at least positive about if not absolutely   :rose::kissgirl::yahoo: :thumbsup:

So I'm running at a 19/22 success rate or 86.5% give or take.   :D

Have seen 6 EE's and only one negative experience so far with what I believe was a Romanian b&s.

snip

I've met around 10 English girls and two remain at the top of my favourites/regulars pile but there are at least 5 I'd never want to see again.


Which is it? 3 or 6?
« Last Edit: November 20, 2014, 10:48:09 pm by StevenS »