Posting AdultWork Private Gallery pics on UKP

[Gordo987]

Just wondering, would posting one or two pics from an escorts AW private gallery be in order on UKP? Some I've seen are really great shots, and some show the girl to be a bit less attractive than her free pics suggest.

Like I said, just wondering

 

[Jimmyredcab]

I can't see a problem ------------------- nothing too graphic though.     

[Pastit]

Just wondering, would posting one or two pics from an escorts AW private gallery be in order on UKP? Some I've seen are really great shots, and some show the girl to be a bit less attractive than her free pics suggest.

Like I said, just wondering

 

I have yet to find a way of posting pictures on here at all ! DOH, Dense Old Man 

[AnthG]

Like I said, just wondering

I have never understood the problem with it either. But you run the risk of the wrath of the girl in question you are doing it for as they sometimes take serious, and crazy, offence at it.

[Gordo987]

I can't see a problem ------------------- nothing too graphic though.     

Perhaps if they have journalistic merit? I mean not being malicious or gratuitous?

[Happylad]

I suspect that if the girl found out, and made a formal complaint to AW, or reported it on the escorts` private message forum, you might find yourself in a lot of trouble and your AW Profile deleted.

[Gordo987]

Perhaps, and in fairness the PG sub is for my own viewing, but I'm not suggesting wholesale publication of the gallery; only one or two 'newsworthy' pics. Anyway, how would the girl link my UKP membership to my AW membership? Is that even possible?

 

[AnthG]

how would the girl link my UKP membership to my AW membership? Is that even possible?

 

If she has a verified AW account she sees the names of all the people who have subbed to her PG. If she for example is relatively unpopular and only has a small number of subs. She could possibly work out who it was from this.

She could also look at your past reviews on UKP and see who you seen previously, and then if you also left feedback for any of those girls on AW at the same time too. It would be easy to work out who you were from those two tactics.

(I hope this ins't considered giving girls ideas, but I figured it was all things a girl would likely figure herslef - especially with the help of Saafe)

[fenderswoop]

Perhaps, and in fairness the PG sub is for my own viewing, but I'm not suggesting wholesale publication of the gallery; only one or two 'newsworthy' pics. Anyway, how would the girl link my UKP membership to my AW membership? Is that even possible?

 

I don't know if this is correct but a girl told me a while back that they do see the AW username of people who buy their private galleries or movies so if you're the only person to view the PG recently they might suspect its you but could never be certain I guess.

[Corus Boy]

The important issue here is, does Admin mind?

Linking to any girls pictures probably infringes copyright and the rules of "Deep Linking" but both would probably be overlooked if linking to public pictures that are in the open lands of the Internet.  However Private Gallery pictures might get more attention.

As I say it is really down to Admin to make a call on this. IMO.

[Jimmyredcab]

The important issue here is, does Admin mind?

Linking to any girls pictures probably infringes copyright and the rules of "Deep Linking" but both would probably be overlooked if linking to public pictures that are in the open lands of the Internet.  However Private Gallery pictures might get more attention.

As I say it is really down to Admin to make a call on this. IMO.

Admin is on the punter's side --------------- not the pro$$ie's side.   

As I pointed out earlier you can't post "explicit" pictures such as a wide open pussy.     

[charming_red]

Definately the admin's call.

But PG pics make good for the wank bank 

[Michelle Independent]

I dont think thats right... If someone hides a faces in public gallery but have a clear picture in private i think its just wrong.

[SmackmaBitchUp]

Cmon do it!!! I've had my cock in my hand in anticipation !!!! 

[ram2184]

Just wondering, would posting one or two pics from an escorts AW private gallery be in order on UKP? Some I've seen are really great shots, and some show the girl to be a bit less attractive than her free pics suggest.

Like I said, just wondering

 

i think it is good and fair for the punter. the prices they charge are very expensive hence members should know what they are gettin. Plus when u pay for the PG u pay for the photos and it becomes yours. Why would you need a wg permission to share it? if they don't want their photo on UKP then don't upload it on AW.

[Gordo987]

I dont think thats right... If someone hides a faces in public gallery but have a clear picture in private i think its just wrong.

UKP members regularly post frank and detailed FRs which the prostitute concerned would consider "just wrong". She might, for example, have a few air brushed blemished that she hides in both public and private galleries, but punters have the right to let other punters know. But thanks for the input Michelle, predictable as it was/is.

[daveev]

Remember the links i posted of exotic ruby, the trouble that caused and they where my own pictures and movies, just watch out for the sniper around the corner, duck you sucker 

[yorkshire123]

I don't know how admin feels but my opinion is that once I have paid for said pictures then they are mine to do with what I wish.

[AnthG]

UKP members regularly post frank and detailed FRs which the prostitute concerned would consider "just wrong". She might, for example, have a few air brushed blemished that she hides in both public and private galleries, but punters have the right to let other punters know. But thanks for the input Michelle, predictable as it was/is.

For the girl in question, is it a case of she hides her face on the free pictures and shows them in private.

Or is it a case of she shows it, but has photoshopped her face in public, but has them unphotoshopped in private?

[Gordo987]

For the girl in question, is it a case of she hides her face on the free pictures and shows them in private.

Or is it a case of she shows it, but has photoshopped her face in public, but has them unphotoshopped in private?

No particular girl in mind. It was just a general question. I wouldn't normally pay to look at PG pics unless I was seriously considering a punt, and I would need some good public pics to get me to that stage. I suppose if I posted a really good pic from a girl's PG it could only do her some good.   

[threechilliman]

I don't know how admin feels but my opinion is that once I have paid for said pictures then they are mine to do with what I wish.

+1

tcm

[SirFrank]

Depends what pics you are talking about and this has been an issue in the past. If the girl in question has no face pics on general display I think it's totally unacceptable to post PG (or from some other source that a punter has somehow discovered - eg Facebook or Instagram) face pics on here. For the most part we're not talking about porn stars here. For me it's totally inappropriate and furthermore I suspect it will be a can of worms in the long run

[bucksboy]

Does anyone know how to do this. I want to post some as she is fine with it.

[Michelle Independent]

Depends what pics you are talking about and this has been an issue in the past. If the girl in question has no face pics on general display I think it's totally unacceptable to post PG (or from some other source that a punter has somehow discovered - eg Facebook or Instagram) face pics on here. For the most part we're not talking about porn stars here. For me it's totally inappropriate and furthermore I suspect it will be a can of worms in the long run

At least some punters understand that we are normal people after all.

[bucksboy]

I agree..will not be face pics or tooooo explicit.

[Jimmyredcab]

At least some punters understand that we are normal people after all.

Princess, the only way to be totally safe is to not post face pics at all on Adultwork, of course that could have a negative effect on your bookings.

Once pictures are on the internet they are there for life ---------------------- I should know.       

[Michelle Independent]

Yes Jimmy but you know best that i am not recognizable from my pics on the street. Unlike some other unlucky girls tht dont know better than that.

[yorkshire123]

At least some punters understand that we are normal people after all.

Sorry I must have missed the post when a member stated that you are abnormal?
Its simple for me, if a prossie doesn't want her anonymity put at risk then don't post a face picture be it in the private or public part of their AW profile gallery.
Personally I agree with the no face picture from PG & wouldn't do it unless said prossie proved to be a con artist however I still stick to my original post, the minute you sold me your pictures they then belong to me.

[Mr Jones]

Does anyone know how to do this. I want to post some as she is fine with it.

1. On the picture you want to insert, right click and select copy image location
2. Click on the insert image icon and paste the image location between the brackets.

or

a) copy the image url
b) click the 'insert image' icon, paste the image url

[PeppyG]

Yes Jimmy but you know best that i am not recognizable from my pics on the street. Unlike some other unlucky girls tht dont know better than that.

Like the ones who post ID in the verification pictures for everyone to see?

[Happylad]

Depends what pics you are talking about and this has been an issue in the past. If the girl in question has no face pics on general display I think it's totally unacceptable to post PG (or from some other source that a punter has somehow discovered - eg Facebook or Instagram) face pics on here. For the most part we're not talking about porn stars here. For me it's totally inappropriate and furthermore I suspect it will be a can of worms in the long run

+1

I hold no brief for the members of the Oldest Profession, but I certainly do not believe that all its members should be subjected to all manner of dirty tricks as a matter of course.

What the OP is suggesting is quite appalling, and it`s the sort of thing that gives all punters a bad name.  The OP, and several other contributors to this thread, seem to believe that paying to LOOK AT the photo`s (which is all that they are there for) somehow gives the OP the ownership of them and the right to do what he wants with them.  It does nothing of the kind; if the OP pays to enter a cinema and watch a film this does not entitle him to video the film and show it publicly, nor does the admission price to a football match entitle him to televise it and broadcast it; what he is suggesting is breach of copyright - theft, if you like it put more bluntly

Furthermore, perhaps he should look at it from the pro$$ie`s point of view - just how would he like it if she (or any other pro$$ie) got hold of a photo of him and posted it in THAT OTHER FORUM whose name we dare not speak - he would be posting here like a shot screaming his head off about the dirty trick being played on him by the wicked pro$$ies - but it is not beyond the bounds of possibiity that if he does what he suggests word will get around on AW and that is precisely what will happen, to which my response would be "serve him right".

[Gordo987]

Depends what pics you are talking about and this has been an issue in the past. If the girl in question has no face pics on general display I think it's totally unacceptable to post PG (or from some other source that a punter has somehow discovered - eg Facebook or Instagram) face pics on here. For the most part we're not talking about porn stars here. For me it's totally inappropriate and furthermore I suspect it will be a can of worms in the long run

Well, I've never understood why some prostitutes are dead against having face pics on their AW page. Plenty of them do, and I would never punt with a woman whose face I've never seen. But if her face isn't showing in her PG, then I don't see how it could be posted on here If, however, she's happy to show her face for a couple of quid in her PG, there is no "privacy" issue; its only a question of money. Also, if she offers Webcam services I assume she shows her face there too. Lets face it (pun intended) if you make your living out of sex, you can't be all that precious about what bits of your anatomy get looked at by prospective customers, can you? 

[OldAdmin]

Furthermore, perhaps he should look at it from the pro$$ie`s point of view - just how would he like it if she (or any other pro$$ie) got hold of a photo of him and posted it in THAT OTHER FORUM whose name we dare not speak

Stupid argument.
The punter is not the one SELLING FOR PROFIT his pics to the WHOLE WORLD like a prossie does on her profile.

[Loverat]

For me it's totally inappropriate and furthermore I suspect it will be a can of worms in the long run

I fully agree. A very foolish precedent to set.

[Gordo987]

... I certainly do not believe that all its members should be subjected to all manner of dirty tricks as a matter of course.

WTF? Who suggested anything of the sort? Are you sure about holding "no brief"? 

[Gordo987]

What the OP is suggesting is quite appalling

WTF 2. I said quite clearly that I am just wondering

[Happylad]

Stupid argument.
The punter is not the one SELLING his pics to the WHOLE WORLD like a prossie does on her profile.

WRONG, you`re arguing from an entirely false premise. The pro$$ie is NOT selling the property in her pics, she is selling the right merely to look at them in situ, just as an art gallery sells you the right to look at the pictures on its walls, but NOT the right to copy them or take them away. Furthermore, I think that if you have another look at AW Rules you will see a clear statement that the photographs are NOT to be copied or reproduced, which is why AW deliberately made it as difficult as it could for copying to be done.

[Gordo987]

Furthermore, perhaps he should look at it from the pro$$ie`s point of view - just how would he like it if she (or any other pro$$ie) got hold of a photo of him and posted it in THAT OTHER FORUM whose name we dare not speak - he would be posting here like a shot screaming his head off about the dirty trick being played on him by the wicked pro$$ies - but it is not beyond the bounds of possibiity that if he does what he suggests word will get around on AW and that is precisely what will happen, to which my response would be "serve him right".

WTF 4. Calm down dear and stop getting you knickers (used advisedly) in a twist. Read what I have written and what others have replied. Actually, I wouldn't mind at all.

[OldAdmin]

WRONG, you`re arguing from an entirely false premise. The pro$$ie is NOT selling the property in her pics, she is selling the right merely to look at them in situ, just as an art gallery sells you the right to look at the pictures on its walls, but NOT the right to copy them or take them away. Furthermore, I think that if you have another look at AW Rules you will see a clear statement that the photographs are NOT to be copied or reproduced, which is why AW deliberately made it as difficult as it could for copying to be done.

This isn't about terms of sale but HOW the person came to have access to the pics.
A punter sending his face pic privately to a prossie (or vice-versa) is TOTALLY DIFFERENT from a prossie selling her pics to the WHOLE WORLD for profit.

[SmackmaBitchUp]

Any pics posted for Sale the operative words being For Sale means you buy ..there yours. If she doesn't and is foolish to think they won't , want them passed on... Then she shouldn't have a PG. Face or not she runs the risk that they will be shared....

[Loverat]

Seems like some people have an exaggerated sense of entitlement.  Just because you can physically do something does not mean that it is right.

[jsparky]

WRONG, you`re arguing from an entirely false premise. The pro$$ie is NOT selling the property in her pics, she is selling the right merely to look at them in situ, just as an art gallery sells you the right to look at the pictures on its walls, but NOT the right to copy them or take them away. Furthermore, I think that if you have another look at AW Rules you will see a clear statement that the photographs are NOT to be copied or reproduced, which is why AW deliberately made it as difficult as it could for copying to be done.

+1

Just because the punters pay for it meaning you have the right to view in private, it doesn't mean you have the right to circulate it in public.

From another perspective, if you have taken nuke photos of your gf/wifes/etc., just because you have the right of photos doesn't mean you have the right to circulate them in public domain.

Remember the revenge porn on Tulisa? or other celebrities?

[Gordo987]

WRONG, you`re arguing from an entirely false premise. The pro$$ie is NOT selling the property in her pics, she is selling the right merely to look at them in situ, just as an art gallery sells you the right to look at the pictures on its walls, but NOT the right to copy them or take them away. Furthermore, I think that if you have another look at AW Rules you will see a clear statement that the photographs are NOT to be copied or reproduced, which is why AW deliberately made it as difficult as it could for copying to be done.

No. I can reproduce and republish a photograph that's in the public domain as long as I am not charging anyone. And if I have a flat that overlooks Chelsea football ground I can't be stopped from watching all their games and nor can I be prevented from asking my friend to join me on the balcony. 

[yorkshire123]

+1

Just because the punters pay for it meaning you have the right to view in private, it doesn't mean you have the right to circulate it in public.

From another perspective, if you have taken nuke photos of your gf/wifes/etc., just because you have the right of photos doesn't mean you have the right to circulate them in public domain.

Remember the revenge porn on Tulisa? or other celebrities?

How your examples have any relevance to prossies selling photo's beats me 

[Steve2]

If a girl or anyone else doesn't want them shared, then they should not put them on the internet full stop. Anything on the internet is likely to come back and bite you at some point in the future

[Gordo987]

+1

Just because the punters pay for it meaning you have the right to view in private, it doesn't mean you have the right to circulate it in public.

From another perspective, if you have taken nuke photos of your gf/wifes/etc., just because you have the right of photos doesn't mean you have the right to circulate them in public domain.

Remember the revenge porn on Tulisa? or other celebrities?

Lets face it pal, you really don't have a clue do you? 

[Loverat]

If a girl or anyone else doesn't want them shared, then they should not put them on the internet full stop. Anything on the internet is likely to come back and bite you at some point in the future

So let's all make sure they get bitten then, eh?
And let's discourage them from putting up photos in case they get published on here.

[SmackmaBitchUp]

So let's all make sure they get bitten then, eh?
And let's discourage them from putting up photos in case they get published on here.

I doubt they would get discouraged maybe a tiny minority... The simple maths for them is it generates money... And AW is not a site they go on for dates.. But each profile is there for one reason to generate money! Be it escorting or pics ...

[Happylad]

This isn't about terms of sale but HOW the person came to have access to the pics.
A punter sending his face pic privately to a prossie (or vice-versa) is TOTALLY DIFFERENT from a prossie selling her pics to the WHOLE WORLD for profit.

You simply don`t get it, do you?  She is not SELLING her pics, she is giving him, for a small payment, a limited (in time) licence to INSPECT the pics - no more than that - just as a cinema gives a licence to watch the film, or a football club to watch the match, and AW makes it quite clear that the pics are NOT to be copied or reproduced.  She is certainly not giving him the right to post copies all over the  nternet If you want to reduce it to legal terms it`s a matter of copyright, and to go on and copy the pics and reproduce them elsewhere is simple theft of copyright just as the copying and pirating of films or music is theft of copyright.

[cueball]

I won't be posting pg pictures, not from any feelings of protection of the prossies privacy but because I won't pay to open their bloody galleries.